XHTML 2 and all that. Another perspective.
John LeCarre weighs in
on the currently beating war drums in the US: A Predatory and Dishonest War. “Americans can still awake to the shame of what is being done in their name.” [via wood s lot]
Karl Dubost
pointed out Mark Pilgrim’s screed on the public-evangelist@w3c.org mailing list today. Karl is a YULblog participant par excellence, so if I am able to make it next month I’ll be sure to talk to him more about this. He clarifies that XHTML 2 is just a working draft – but even as such, it’s pretty hostile to the people who have been working with this stuff among the public.
Mark Pilgrim
seems pissed today: Semantic obsolescence. “I bought into every argument the W3C made that keeping up with standards, validating, and using semantic markup now would somehow ‘future-proof’ my site and provide some mystical ‘forward compatibility’. How about some fucking payoff now? How about some fucking compatibility?”
I think I agree with him.
Doc Searls lists
nine things that indicate a media company gets the net in his piece, “Cut off the head and the body dies” (apropos of Steve Case stepping down at AOL). It’s a pretty good list, in particular because it identifies that one of the net’s primary values to a traditional media outlet is to increase the authoritativeness of a publication. Linkability or stability are key elements.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 257
- 258
- 259
- 260
- 261
- …
- 573
- Next Page »