this is mikel.org — Page 152 — Michael Boyle's weblog

The SFGate is running a good article

August 31, 2004 by Michael Boyle

by Benny Evangelista rounding up several of the recent threads in the current entertainment v technology development Battle Royale: Reining in tech – Learning from the Napster case, the entertainment industry is trying to block new technology before it takes off.

Wow!

August 31, 2004 by Michael Boyle

Just announced in Paris: the iMac G5. The whole computer’s inside the screen. Not sure if it’s for me, but a lot of people will love this.

at BlackBoxVoting.org are spreading the word about yet another security concern related to Diebold equipment. This time, however, it isn’t the individual voting machine at issue. Rather, it seems that the Diebold GEMS central tabulator contains a stunning security hole. “By entering a 2-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created. This set of votes can be changed, so that it no longer matches the correct votes. The voting system will then read the totals from the bogus vote set.” [via Boing Boing]

John Nichols, from The Nation,

August 31, 2004 by Michael Boyle

notes that Michael Moore was in the press box at Madison Square Garden when McCain took his jab at him last night at the Republican National Convention. Apparently Moore was there on assignment from USA Today.

Richard Posner offers

August 30, 2004 by Michael Boyle

a balanced and subtle dissent to the 9/11 Commission Report and subsequent praise for the document.

Much more troublesome are the inclusion in the report of recommendations (rather than just investigative findings) and the commissioners’ misplaced, though successful, quest for unanimity. Combining an investigation of the attacks with proposals for preventing future attacks is the same mistake as combining intelligence with policy. The way a problem is described is bound to influence the choice of how to solve it. The commission’s contention that our intelligence structure is unsound predisposed it to blame the structure for the failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks, whether it did or not. And pressure for unanimity encourages just the kind of herd thinking now being blamed for that other recent intelligence failure — the belief that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.