are pretty brazen about their plans to control and meter the wireless space. I’m not worried – if they focus on this they’ll ignore the next generation, or two generations from now, and they’ll look like they’re trying to re-invent compuserve when along comes a much more sophisticated system – one that’ll look a lot like the internet, with its attendent openness and chaos.
That was a bit
of a rant this afternoon and glossed over lots of stuff – in the post about MS. So let me clarify one or two things. First, yes, I do think it’s a complete smokescreen, that MS has no real intention of doing any of this, at least in the complete, all-encompassing way they are trying to sell. Second, for 99 percent of companies in the world I agree that it’s a GOOD thing not a negative that there are tons of others in this space already. Microsoft just doesn’t seem to be one of them, based on past performance. Third, if they were really serious about this, practically the whole presentation would have been about wireless. dot-NET type systems only make sense when you’re talking about a radically different landscape made up of massively-deployed wireless networks using standards-based protocols like IPv6. Microsoft has a good record with their browser to date, but I don’t see them betting the farm on external standards. Which means, to me, that it’s either not serious or will never happen regardless.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 3
- 4
- 5