An article by John Markoff in the NY Times suggests that Google is about to introduce a today was remarkable. It was entitled, For Iraqis to Win, the U.S. Must Lose and included the following stunning sentence, “we went into Iraq with what, in retrospect, seems like a childish fantasy. We were going to topple Saddam, establish democracy and hand the country back to grateful Iraqis. We expected to be universally admired when it was all over.” The trouble is that he says it as if this is just now occurring to him, and that this is a great insight that he is imparting to us. In fact, the points he makes are precisely what the anti-war crowd has, in the main, been saying all along. He writes, “There was a failure to understand the effect our power would have on other people around the world. We were so sure we were using our might for noble purposes, we assumed that sooner or later, everybody else would see that as well.” And, later, “we didn’t understand the tragic irony that our power is also our weakness.” Brooks may not have understood it, but WE – those of us against this brash adventure from the start – we did understand it perfectly well. This IS the internationalist, pro-UN argument. Internationalists know that the UN, as highly imperfect as it is, was founded for the very reason that no nation could rely on narrow perceptions of nobility as the basis for action – particularly action that would have any kind of legitimacy. That to act required a framework in which that action might take place. Harry Truman, after he gave the order to drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki – he certainly understood the irony of power. Great Britain, at the end of its rule of India, certainly knew the irony of power. Gandhi liberated hundreds of millions of people from Colonial rule using NOTHING but the irony of British power against it. These are the people that founded the UN. Sadly, though the US has to learn the lesson all over again. Unfortunately, that will only happen when the current crowd is turfed out of office. For they will refuse to read the signs, though they are lit up in neon for all the world to see. is providing internet access to Condoleezza Rice’s public testimony before the Sept 11 Commission. It’s amazing though – she lies as easily as she breathes, as far as I can tell. She just now was talking about the Department of Homeland Security and how important it is to US security. Trouble is, the Bush Administration blocked the formation of such a department, which was proposed long before Sept 11 by the Hart-Rudman Commission. Later…I can’t believe this – now she’s straight out blaming Clinton. “We were in office for 238 days” she said, “Why didn’t the previous adminstration address these structural issues…” etc etc. Clue: they DID. They got the ball rolling, but for purely ideological reasons the Bush Administration shelved everything they did and tried to start again. They threw out the baby with the bathwater and then turned around and used their utter failure on terrorism to justify an illegal war on an unrelated state. Simply amazing. War in the Ruins of Diplomacy. “This war crowns a period of terrible diplomatic failure, Washington’s worst in at least a generation.” seems like a pretty reasonable analysis of the current sad situation: Tell the Truth. “Some of this we can’t control. But some we can, which is why it’s time for the Bush team to shape up – dial down the attitude, start selling this war on the truth, give us a budget that prepares the nation for a war abroad, not a party at home, and start doing everything possible to create a global context where we can confront Saddam without the world applauding for him.”The NY Times Op-Ed by David Brooks
The New York Times
The New York Times editorial:
Friedman’s latest column in the NYTimes