Ed notes that Byte Magazine is set to return in early 2002.
I have always
been interested in the way that newspapers cover stories, not just the stories themselves. What’s the slant? Is a theme evident that is responding to a particularly important piece of news? What about bias (corporate or individual)? Things like that. The Organization of News Ombudsmen site looks like it might be a good addition to my media diet.
For my part
For my part, personal journalism and/or weblogging has expanded and enriched my media environment, and in doing so has radically changed my expectations of that whole terrain. At one time there was a particular flow: CNN to network documentary and commentary to daily newspaper think pieces to magazine coverage. Or something like that. With the rise of tools that enable individual online publishing, my expectations from magazines and “thinkier” newspapers has changed. I can get a vast range of perspectives from across the waterfront on weblogs, and almost immediately.
So on the front end of a crisis, I rely on both TV and weblogs – “fact” and opinion, right up front. And I expect the print media – daily, weekly, and monthly – to take into account not only that I have the facts already, but that I also have access to a variety of (informed and not) opinions already – something for which they have traditionally been the main source.
Via Zeldman
I find myself yearning
to read some theory again. I’ve been out of it for so long – but at the same time more deeply embedded than ever. A college in BC has put together a great list of Canadian media theorists and relevant resources that might be a good start, even though I’ve read them all before quite extensively. You can’t go wrong starting with Canadian media theory.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- …
- 42
- Next Page »