has marked my all-time lowest number of weblog entries, and it’s going to get worse before it gets better. I’m going away to the first cottage party of the summer this weekend, and then I’m off on a business trip at the beginning of next week. At that, however, I am working on an ambitious (if hidden) weblog project at work, which is at a big multinational corp.
From eCompany Now
(a magazine, and not a bad one at that): Boo! And the 100 Other Dumbest Moments in e-Business History. Hilarious.
Oh my
. The third item down (as of this writing) is a piece about whispers going around that Automatic-Media is in trouble. Of course Automatic-Media is the year-old umbrella that includes Suck and Feed, plus Plastic.
The sad thing for me is that it’s not really a shock. We’ve been hearing stories like this for ages now – even though this one doesn’t seem to include the otherwise required extravagance. That’s not to say that it wouldn’t be a tremendous loss, though, either.
It’s not fashionable to say, but a whole lot of the web can be traced back directly to Suck, for instance. If it were a rock and roll family tree, Suck would be Robert Johnson or someone – not always remembered, but totally fundamental. Feed would be… who? Well except for the temporal inconsistency with the above, maybe the Velvet Underground or someone – geeky, art-schoolish, but at the very heart of things in important ways.
Newer web people (and old ones too) might think I’m over-stating it, and maybe I am. But still. It’s the old fogey thing to say, but you had to be there when Suck launched. It was a wild time – no names (though Carl and Joey’s authorship was a poorly-kept secret, which was certainly intentional), no lame business model to muddy things. No ugly colour scheme, no gee-whiz graphics save for the title itself.
I hope these are just rumours and that they can work it out if not.
The copyright question
that has most touched me and my friends – far more than Napster since I know so many writers – is being heard by the Supreme Court next week: Writers Fight for E-Rights. A couple of things spring to mind. First, there were signed contracts that specified the limited rights of the publications that purchased the articles. Second, this can be dealt with easily by splitting things up the middle – keeping the publications and historians happy by mandating that the items be licensed by writers for archival purposes, but paying them for the additional usage. Third – this is coming to the music world eventually. As I’ve written, I’ll come much closer to supporting record labels in their anti-Napster (etc.) fight the minute I see them taking steps to commit to paying the artists for electronic rights to the music.
Sometimes one comes across
the most interesting things late at night when one has no business doing so. So here I am, sitting at my computer post-bar, pre-bedtime, reading some nice personal websites. And I follow the link that Jason Kottke has put up to his earliest “daily website” or weblog entry from three years ago. And I find that but days after he started, he made a very pithy comment about the state of the web at that time – and if anything it’s even worse now (if hypertext = better and pseudo-hypertext = worse). I among hundreds of others have made the same comment, both before and after he did. But one of the nice things about the weblog format is that you can date a comment and fix it in time – something that’s hard to do in with quite the same certainty as in a weblog.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- …
- 18
- Next Page »